But memclr+copy is slower than just copy, right? On Jun 27, 2017 6:53 PM, "T L" <tapir....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 8:55:48 PM UTC-4, Kevin Malachowski wrote: >> >> It's best to compare the assembly, but my guess: 'make' has to zero out >> the memory, whereas allocation using append does not. > > > allocation using append will copy each element, which should be slower > than memclr. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/golang-nuts/nDYYHKwvYhQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
