It's not ready for general use, but it certainly isn't dead. I think a lack of examples for some of the more-complex widgets is probably where it needs the most help, but considering that only one person is working on it the result is a very impressive addition to the Go ecosystem. I've not used the widgets much, and ended up porting/reimplementing <http://github.com/as/frame> Plan 9's libframe due to my inability to understand how to get editable text on the screen. This was over a year ago, so things may have changed. I agree with the general consensus, standard widgets are the biggest obstacle for exp/shiny, but those require effort to be ported, and maybe copying what already exists isn't the best approach either.
On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 1:25:02 PM UTC-7, fazal wrote: > > It was one of the things I was looking forward to, but I see almost no > activity there, which makes me sad. > > Is it because it is mature enough for general use? There is a road-map for > widgets but non are complete. I really hope it is not abandoned because Go > really needs a GUI library that is idiomatic. > > Regards, > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
