thanks for looking, you have understood and argued well against my points being significant.
i was trying to show-up, and see if there was agreement, that this code could benefit from some re-factoring/simplification. but my problem is; i have an html doc that looks quite poor, but according to the documentation shouldn't, so for now, i guess i'm going to have to try to rewrite some comments so they look nice with, or without, the 'implicit rule' in effect, you know, in-case it goes away in the future. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
