Yeah! And since I've learnt English mostly from SciFi and Fantasy movie heroes (with a misplaced sense of self-righteousness), I make boo boos from time to time - which are not that harmful and entertain people! :)
There are other things that I might be interested to be improved about Go (MO-Oriented improvements which MO-Oriented tweaks about the syntax are just a small part of it). But as for this thread seems the discussion made it's way to a level that needs some more time to manifest itself as conclusions - if it meant to be any at all. And I'm positive Go will continue to grow and get better at things. On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 3:03:18 PM UTC+3:30, RickyS wrote: > > > 1. Oh, I'm all for improvement. I just want somebody to invent > something in the field of re-use that is as much a breakthrough as > Cooperating Sequential Processes was to the field of multi-processing. Go > would be a good place to install that invention, as it is still a simple > language. > > 2. And you mean go must *adapt*, perhaps by ad*o*pting new features... > > > On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 1:17:22 PM UTC+2, dc0d wrote: >> >> ...Go must adopt. ... >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
