If you really have legal concerns you should talk to a lawyer. Asking for 
anonymous opinion on a forum isn't legal advice. This should certainly not 
be the place to discuss legal matters such as the scope of a license. I 
don't think anybody who answered you is actually a lawyer. If you come upon 
something which you can't understand its license then don't use it.

Le mardi 15 mai 2018 18:55:13 UTC+2, matthe...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> I get that we have to work with the legal system details and that they may 
> cause strange terms. Thanks for sharing some of those US details.
>
> Isn’t there responsibility in putting tools out there publicly for anybody 
> to use? Perhaps public distribution under the terms “don’t use this” is 
> irresponsible and could be invalidated to the jury. I’m more concerned 
> about the event that caused the court to be necessary though.
>
> Can Sears laser engrave “this isn’t useful for anything” on their tools to 
> avoid litigation due to poor craftsmanship? Is Sears responsible for poor 
> craftsmanship causing injury if the Sears tool was bought second-hand at a 
> garage sale?
>
> Matt
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 11:18:04 AM UTC-5, Matthias B. wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) 
>> matthe...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>
>> > I don’t think I’m suggesting to not disclaim liability. I’m 
>> > suggesting to claim that I didn’t hide anything to make a use break 
>> > on purpose. It does add liability, but this is liability that is 
>> > completely in the author’s control unlike regular bugs or misuse that 
>>
>> That's where you are wrong. 
>> The author has no control over WHAT OTHER PEOPLE CLAIM he did. 
>> If he makes a statement that he didn't intentionally put bad things into 
>> the code and bad things happen, he ends up having to prove that these 
>> are actually bugs and not intentional. And if the developer is unlucky 
>> enough to live in the US, this looks like this: 
>>
>> * a jury of 12 laypersons, with NO UNDERSTANDING OF CODE WHATSOEVER 
>> * a very slick and convincing expert who says that he's reviewed the 
>>   code and he's 100% certain that this is intentional and not a bug 
>> * some awkward nerd claiming it's a bug 
>>
>> The 12 laypeople decide who they trust more based on their "soft 
>> skills". 
>>
>> It's not a coincidence that this whole EULA and total disclaimer BS was 
>> started by US organizations. The US legal system is pure madness and US 
>> lawyers are like mosquitoes. If you leave just a tiny bit of skin 
>> exposed, they'll smell it and will try to land on it to suck your 
>> blood. Whatever drawbacks you perceive from the current language in 
>> licenses is way less bad than the alternative. 
>>
>> MSB 
>>
>> -- 
>> No man is more pitiful than the one who looks to the shadows for warmth. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to