I kind of like this idea. Contracts seem likely to introduce all kinds of complexity, and with a bit more explicit code, just generics without contracts could work just fine. It's definitely the simplest implementation of generics that could work.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
