I always assumed that there is no "private" in Go - it is either public or package level. So generic's being able to access same package level accessible things seems to be logical.
Andrey On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 10:21:15 AM UTC-6, Andy Balholm wrote: > > I don’t think that generic functions should have access to private fields > of their type parameters, regardless of what package they are in. > > Andy > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
