On Thursday, 18 October 2018 08:00:56 UTC+2, Beoran wrote: > > After reading his proposal, I think you should help Burak Sedar work out > his proposal in the other thread. >
Where is Burak Sedar's proposal? > It is conceptually a lot easier than the idea of contracts, but likely to > be more powerful even. To me it has the ideal Go-like feel and it solves > the problem with operator overloading in one stroke. Use concrete types, > including primitive types as "contracts". That is a brilliant idea to me. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
