You can use https://github.com/albrow/fo and see what code it generates. Conceptually, I imagine will it be close to what the draft spec would produce. Some differences and limitations: - it uses square brackets instead of (type .. ) for the type parameters - it is limited to a single main() package - doesn't use contracts (but not relevant for your question since contracts are for compile time)
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 12:14:42 PM UTC-4, Jamie Clarkson wrote: > > Replying to myself but I've got a different method with a dictionary per > type instead of the interface per value: > > iv) Dictionary based: https://play.golang.org/p/t6GBTEgq_g6 > > (that one based on reflect but could use the slice interfaces or similar) > > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 3:39:09 PM UTC, Jamie Clarkson wrote: >> >> Ah ok, sorry I don't want to waste your time getting into the >> nitty-gritty of a hypothetical situation but are you meaning the >> code for (say): >> >> func (u *_UserEdge) Nodes() _SliceN { >> nodes := u.UserEdge.Nodes() // type []UserNode >> return _SliceUserNode(nodes) >> } >> >> ? >> >> On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 3:19:42 PM UTC, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Jamie Clarkson <jnc...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm not sure what you meant by conversion of non-interface to >>> interface >>> > types to handle results? I can see the usual conversions working fine >>> at >>> > the call site for input parameters but the actual ShortestPath func >>> seems to >>> > need to use interface throughout? >>> >>> I mean in converting the slice returned by Edge.Nodes to the >>> implicitly generated slice interface type. >>> >>> Ian >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
