Breaks backwards compatibility as the switch may already be in a for loop and
using continue...
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 11:50 PM, Göcs Jëss <laurengoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We might as well reduce a one rarely used keyword
>
> continue means recommence or resume after interruption by google
>
> if a continue triggers, the switch, select, or for loop statement resumes
> another case or condition
>
> we could do continues inside switch statements
>
> switch 1 {
> case 1:
> continue
> case 0:
> }
>
> we could do continues as well inside select statements
> select {
> case a := <-c1:
> continue
> case b := <-c2:
> // X
> }
>
> we could still do continues inside for loop statements
> for {
> continue
> }
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
