I just found this post. Do you know where we can get Fraczooms. I loved it as a high schooler!
On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 11:51:56 AM UTC-4, hsmyers wrote: > > Interface differences are often similar to discussions about calculator > styles. Some swear by RPN, others swear at it :) I'd be happy enough with > leaving the box up and maybe an hour-glass cursor. Just avoid visual > silence as it tends to look like nothing is going on... > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:42 AM, <pragma...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Drawing a box is exactly how earlier versions worked. I did this, first, >> because other renderers did the same. I found drawing a box was not >> intuitive at all. >> >> People just could not figure it out. >> >> The reason is that there is no conceptual mapping unless you have already >> seen that behaviour in another program. >> >> What happens is, people do a very small click. This makes a tiny box and >> they zoom into some tiny area and wonder what happened. >> >> So small click = ginormous change. >> >> My UI design has the property that small-click = small-change and >> big-click = big-change. >> >> Now I can send it to people with no instructions! >> >> The problems you describe is that it requires a loading/aspect ratio >> munging indicator i.e. >> https://github.com/johnny-morrice/webdelbrot/issues/10 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
