Congrats, I am sure a lot of gophers waited for something like this ! I especially like this comment: "No node. No JS. No npm. No node_modules folder competing with your music library for disk space" 😂
On Friday, 29 March 2019 04:39:42 UTC, Brad wrote: > > Now that WebAssembly is available as an (experimental) compilation target, > it raises the question of how feasible is it to make a quality UI library. > Vue (my personal fav) and React, while they have their issues, do have many > ideas which are good and seem like they may translate well over to > WebAssembly. > > Here's a working experimental Vue-like UI library with tools to write UI > components in .vugu files (similar in concept to .vue files): > https://github.com/vugu/vugu; Getting Started page: > http://www.vugu.org/doc/start > > HTML with logic in it gets code generated to .go files. In-browser > rendering in wasm with DOM sync as well as static HTML output are > implemented. > > And this is my cheesy bullet-pointed list that makes it sound a lot more > mature than it is: > > * Runs in-browser using WebAssembly > * Single-file components > * Vue-like markup syntax > * Write idiomatic Go code > * Rapid prototyping > * ~3 minute setup > * Standard Go build tools > > I'm curious what people think of the approach and ideas for improvement. > > --brad > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
