Just to clarify : My original proposal was to include as part of Go the
syntax
(test) ? {
{ //..code block for test=true
} : {
//..code block for test=false
}
I am NOT in favor of allowing nested ternary operations
In addition, I also propose allowing un-nested '?' as an alternative
assignment statement i.e. var = (temp >80) ? "red": "blue"
Thus, any further discussion of this topic should not involve issues
related to nested ternary operations
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 9:05:31 PM UTC-4, lgo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> It sure would be nice if Go syntax allowed programmers to replace
>
> if ( test) {
> ...do sonething
> } else {
> ..do something else
> }
>
> with
>
> ? (test) {
> //...do something
> }
> {
> //..do something else
> }
>
> The ? operator can be anything the Go language team considers appropriate
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
