This is interesting. I have exactly the opposite situation; up-down is much easier than significant left-right because of faulty saccades.
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 11:41 -0700, Michael Jones wrote: > Bakul, more good arguments. I have another motivation in the "?" > world that > I've not argued because it is personal/not general, but a decade ago > I had > two detached retinas, surgeries, and imperfect recovery. Part of my > vision > that I lost is just below the center...maybe -15 degrees to -40 > degrees. > The brain knows when I want to see things things there and moves the > eyes > around to gather that part of the visual field. This "hunting" is > tiring of > the muscles and causes issues. left-to-right density is easy for me, > vertical is very bad. Your: > > x := b? 2 : 1 > > is instantaneous, a sight read; while the: > > var x int > if b { > x = 2 > } else { > x = 1 > } > > and > > x := 1 > if b { > x = 2 > } > > ...feel like climbing Everest. It is hard to explain the difficulty. > Fortunately it is not a widespread problem. Certainly not Go's > problem, but > I'd pay double for a "wide" mode where gofmt tolerated "var x int; if > b { x > = 2 } else { x = 1 }". In fact, now that i've just seen this, I am > going to > make a local version and hook it to vs code. Why did I not think of > this > before! Wow. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e256bf8c6f380acf4999385f4d1e557f1f201d6b.camel%40kortschak.io. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.