Yes, it should be contracts.Ordered to justify the use of the '<' operator.
The proposed new built-in comparable contract will only permit one to use '==' or '!='. I agree that the revised design is very good, contracts are now far more intelligible than they were and the whole thing just feels much more Go-like to me :) As the response so far has been generally positive, hopefully it won't be too long before this proceeds to the 'proposal' stage. Alan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c4166030-8dc7-4f78-8d0c-68ee6d67906a%40googlegroups.com.
