Out of curiosity only. > On Oct 26, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > Why not generate Go? > >>> On Oct 26, 2019, at 9:40 AM, JuciÊ Andrade <oju...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> Feel free to classify the tool anyway you like, Anca. >> >> I don't buy the distinction between "compiler" and "transpiler" because it's >> the same thing. They read code in some language and generates code in some >> language. >> >> I picked C for output because it is utterly portable and everyone could >> enjoy the games. Any other output format would exclude someone. >> >>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 11:30:35 AM UTC-3, Anca Emanuel wrote: >>> Ah so it is an transpiller: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-to-source_compiler >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c9946e3b-0648-4260-b1bc-811ec9179f5d%40googlegroups.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/B71BBFE8-5F7B-4C9F-BECD-78642176F62C%40ix.netcom.com.
