On 2020-03-03 22:22, Robert Engels wrote: > A key statement in the link “ The JIT-generated code is *significantly* faster > than the ahead-of-time-generated code for small matrix sizes.” > > Which is what you were arguing was not possible... you can’t have it both > ways.
JIT code often requires RWX memory and JAVA has long been a violator of security protections in this area. I believe Pythons crypto package is still a RWX memory creator. I hope the strive for performance doesn't come at the cost of reducing the potential of an OS or memory protection unit/management to protect us. Coupled with restarting failing programs, it is a potentially dangerous default practice. IMO, performance desires by a smaller group have kept C insecure and hurt the masses! "https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenBSD-Browser-Security"; "https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=142523501726732"; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7cee8967-2506-e238-eca0-e1b994f7a0e4%40gmail.com.
