Wouldn't it be nice to have just
func Foo(type T1, type T2 Bar)
(type as keyword splitting it into 2 type declarations)
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 5:50:47 AM UTC-6, Brian Candler wrote:
>
> Consider a generic where you want T1 unconstrained but T2 constrained. If
> you write
>
> func Foo(type T1, T2 Bar)
>
> then Bar constrains both. Hence the need for
>
> func Foo(type T1 interface{}, T2 Bar)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e786a8bf-2837-4496-9fba-731b83c04cfco%40googlegroups.com.
