On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:52 AM David Riley <fraveyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, to this specific point: this exact approach, as with much of Go, > embodies the Bell Labs approach to design (for better or for worse, and > with good reason). Sometimes we have to live with the artifacts of > evolution. > One interesting counterexample here is the GC and scheduler, which take on a huge amount of complexity in the implementation to create a dead-simple interface. It seems like Go is willing to take a worse-is-better approach when the amount of interface complexity is relatively small. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA%3DXfu3xWV94g5smX%3D6kk3QD9fzZN_nhwqF0XykVsmUBDKLTLw%40mail.gmail.com.
