Check https://godoc.org/modernc.org/memory, maybe it can be used in this
scenario. Note, using the package concurrently from multiple goroutines
requires coordination, like with a mutex.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 19:35 <netconnect.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have an application where I will be allocating millions of data
> structures, all of the same size. My program will need to run continuously
> and be pretty responsive to
> its network peers.
>
> The data is fairly static, once allocated it will rarely need to be
> modified or deleted.
>
> In order to minimize the garbage collection scanning overhead, I was
> thinking of allocating large blocks on the heap that were a fixed size that
> would hold 20K or so elements
> and then write a simple allocator to hand out pieces of those blocks when
> needed. Instead of having to scan millions of items on the heap, the GC
> would only be scanning 100 or so
> items.
>
> Sound reasonable?  Or does this 'go' against the golang way of doing
> things?
>
> F
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0be7d132-71d6-4ff9-a8eb-ca09a94fafeao%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0be7d132-71d6-4ff9-a8eb-ca09a94fafeao%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-Vn%2Bg8Yb9%3DX-K_95%3Dt6kQ3gr43kpj9JMwxRk3FMEv00Rw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to