On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 10:45 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Another possibility is constraints.Any, although that is no shorter
> than interface{}. I'm not sure _ is best; currently _ fairly
> consistently means "ignore this value," but in this usage it would
> mean something different.
Another possibility would be `...` which at least in the context of
arrays means "fill this in with the information you have elsewhere";
`var a [...]int{1,2,3,4}`. There is no other use of the ellipsis
operator in the type parameters, so this should work.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/9918b7c7fe023f40f56874e2de1b42eb67297041.camel%40kortschak.io.
