godoc-static v0.1.8 is now available featuring improved support for Go modules.
On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 3:45:49 PM UTC-8 Trevor Slocum wrote: > I've had some time to polish this project somewhat. It should be fairly > usable. > > I've added ZIP archive generation to allow browsing offline without godoc. > > Any additional feedback is welcome. > > On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 8:22:51 AM UTC-8, Trevor Slocum wrote: >> >> Hey Nick, I did consider that and hope to still visit it. I chose to >> scrape instead because the output requires only minimal alteration to >> achieve the desired result. Example code expansion is rewritten to not >> require JavaScript by using <details> and <summary> and not much more. >> Large changes to output from the godoc tool can certainly break >> godoc-static in its current state. Assistance with exploring generating >> similar output without using godoc would be appreciated. >> >> >> On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 7:14:51 AM UTC-8, Nick wrote: >>> >>> Quoth tsl...@gmail.com: >>> > Inspired by the recent news of godoc.org shutting down I have created >>> > godoc-static. While we could all migrate to pkg.go.dev >>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fpkg.go.dev&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFD8_H2Rd0Wkru18VMbgo-izMbd9Q>, >>> >>> we could also host and >>> > update our documentation ourselves. >>> >>> Cool, sounds interesting, I like the idea of more tools to make more >>> distributed hosting of go stuff easier! >>> >>> > When invoked, "godoc -http=localhost:####" is started, relevant >>> package >>> > documentation pages and source code is scraped and rewritten to fix >>> styling, >>> > expanding content, etc., then godoc is terminated. >>> >>> Interesting approach. Did you consider taking the code that godoc >>> uses (either direct copying or including it somehow) and generating >>> the HTML directly? I can imagine that might not be straightforward, >>> but I'm interested to hear why you chose this approach instead. >>> Without having looked at the code, I would imagine it would be more >>> liable to break with future versions of godoc which change the >>> output. >>> >>> Anyway, good job, I may use it myself soon, and will let you know >>> how I get on. >>> >>> Nick >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/59d45342-c8ae-4dc7-8b2d-96910b9906d8n%40googlegroups.com.
