I appreciate that generics use will be optional. However I am concerned that neither in the design draft nor the proposal issue, that the word security nor safety has been used even once.
Assuming generics like interfaces, potentially erode type safety. Will generics increase the likelihood of security issues, aside from panics? Will it make package choice more important as a result? Now for the one where I may need to duck afterwards. How many security issues and/or production panics to date might have been avoided by avoiding interface use all together? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/DEFAB41C-6AF9-49FE-955A-4ED730C57DDE%40gmail.com.
