Perhaps providing some code could be helpful. That way we can better understand what the issues are. Minimally the function signatures you have now, and the signature of common function you are calling inside them, as well as the definitions of any types being passes. Of course, the full code of before and after would be ideal, if you can share.
On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 8:21:30 AM UTC-5 m8il...@gmail.com wrote: > I have three logging functions that are almost identical. > > If I move the identicle code into a function without pointers then there > is a > noticeable speed decrease. I know this is premature optimisation as logging > shouldn't happen frequently enough or be that large (hopefully). > > That said. I am left wondering aside from code generation steps and copy > and > paste (current solution) if I am unaware of any options that might avoid > pointer > use, such as: > > 1./ scoped global, like a Class might provide > > 2./ macro type instantiation that simply inserts the code at compile time > but > without the compiler doing any computations > > I assume not, from perusing the spec? > > p.s. It's fine if the solution is pointers. Just wondering if I can avoid > panic > potential. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1a15ed31-29d2-4214-926a-b53d30abb27fn%40googlegroups.com.
