You didn't show us the actual commands you are running to produce the two
log files. It is also unclear why you expect benchstat to report a
difference. In other words: insufficient information for anyone to make
even a guess why benchstat isn't producing the output you expect.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tong Sun <suntong...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand the benchstat's output.
> The benchstat that I have is fresh from golang.org/x/perf/cmd/, installed
> hours ago.
>
> This is understandable:
>
> name            old time/op    new time/op    delta
> FormatEmoji-2     1.79µs ± 0%    1.82µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-4     1.99µs ± 1%    1.91µs ± 4%   ~     (p=0.200 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-8     1.97µs ± 3%    1.99µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.700 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-12    2.05µs ± 1%    2.03µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.400 n=3+3)
>
> name            old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
> FormatEmoji-2       384B ± 0%      384B ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-4       386B ± 0%      385B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.700 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-8       387B ± 0%      386B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.400 n=3+3)
> FormatEmoji-12      388B ± 0%      388B ± 0%   ~     (p=1.000 n=3+3)
>
> name            old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
> FormatEmoji-2       7.00 ± 0%      7.00 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
> FormatEmoji-4       7.00 ± 0%      7.00 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
> FormatEmoji-8       7.00 ± 0%      7.00 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
> FormatEmoji-12      7.00 ± 0%      7.00 ± 0%   ~     (all equal)
>
> However,
>
> Why benchstat thinks there is no differences between the following two
> runs?
>
> $ benchstat /tmp/old.log /tmp/new.log
> name                  old time/op    new time/op    delta
> FormatEmojiString-2     1.79µs ± 0%    6.81µs ± 2%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-4     1.99µs ± 1%    7.22µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-8     1.97µs ± 3%    7.55µs ± 2%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-12    2.05µs ± 1%    7.64µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> name                  old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
> FormatEmojiString-2       384B ± 0%     1459B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-4       386B ± 0%     1463B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-8       387B ± 0%     1468B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-12      388B ± 0%     1473B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> name                  old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
> FormatEmojiString-2       7.00 ± 0%     25.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-4       7.00 ± 0%     25.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-8       7.00 ± 0%     25.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiString-12      7.00 ± 0%     25.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> I'd think that the delta will be quite big.
>
> Now take a look at this. benchstat thinks there is no differences between
> the following two runs is beyond imagination:
>
> $ benchstat /tmp/old.log /tmp/new.log
> name                 old time/op    new time/op      delta
> FormatEmojiBlock-2     1.79µs ± 0%  13543.09µs ± 4%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-4     1.99µs ± 1%  14597.09µs ± 1%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-8     1.97µs ± 3%  16390.62µs ± 2%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-12    2.05µs ± 1%  17409.37µs ± 2%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> name                 old alloc/op   new alloc/op     delta
> FormatEmojiBlock-2       384B ± 0%   15270330B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-4       386B ± 0%   15270671B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-8       387B ± 0%   15271206B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-12      388B ± 0%   15271727B ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> name                 old allocs/op  new allocs/op    delta
> FormatEmojiBlock-2       7.00 ± 0%     3467.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-4       7.00 ± 0%     3467.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-8       7.00 ± 0%     3467.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
> FormatEmojiBlock-12      7.00 ± 0%     3467.00 ± 0%   ~     (p=0.100 n=3+3)
>
> What's happening? What I've done wrong?
>
> Thx
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a56a17b1-a8c3-4926-a27a-21cd86074f67n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a56a17b1-a8c3-4926-a27a-21cd86074f67n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Kurtis Rader
Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CABx2%3DD8R2NBveVArAchBOkrL1qZ6oNRpFqWLqbF7aKG5o3L%2Bxw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to