I believe the Recv field does what you want?
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 8:20:19 PM UTC+2 tjgur...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a tool for internal use where I had to work with the go's
> abstract syntax tree specially with the FuncDecls. I wanted to filter the
> ast to only function declarations without methods. I was wondering if there
> is a way to distinguish between normal functions and structure methods. I'm
> sure there must be a way since the godoc distinguishes them but don't know
> if they had to implement it in a certain way.
>
> Currently my code uses AST's inspect function and traverses the tree.
> Example,
>
> ```Go
> ast.Inspect(syntaxtTree, func(n *ast.Node) bool {
> ...
> switch x := n.(type) {
> case *ast.FuncDecl:
> ...
> }
> ```
>
> If anyone knows a way to distinguish these, please do let me know. Thanks!
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1b52e479-ab40-4859-ace0-604baf9b355bn%40googlegroups.com.
