Hi, So I have a working implementation of a UI framework underway. I've ended up providing ways to define the UI tree in a declarative way.
But to make sure it is legible, I have a gist with 3 examples of how the UI tree could be defined. (taken from an implementation of TODOMVC) https://gist.github.com/atdiar/0d829060221ecb016c6001761b89d202 1. Full declarative structure specification but CSS classes are added outside of the tree. Also, not very componentized. 2. Declarative but using components defined imperatively. CSS added in-tree as a modifier function. 3. Same as above but CSS is added outside of the tree. Which one do you prefer? Any suggestions to improve? == -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/203b1251-60d7-42b8-851d-d5b978b1c7a3n%40googlegroups.com.
