Instead of a closure, could you put loopCnt and errCnt in a struct, and then make your loopErrMsg be a method on that?
On Tuesday, 26 July 2022 at 16:03:01 UTC+1 gocss wrote: > also found this so it is a known limitation: > https://github.com/golang/go/issues/44350 > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 10:39:06 AM UTC-4 gocss wrote: > >> Appears 'go vet -printf.funcs loopErrMsgf' >> does not detect incorrect verbs or lack thereof on anonymous functions >> ... :( >> as shown above, which is my desired use case. >> >> On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 10:02:19 AM UTC-4 gocss wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to configure 'go vet' to a variant of sprintf/printf that >>> I rolled >>> >>> such >>> >>> loopErrMsgf := func(format string, params ...interface{}) string { >>> errCnt++ >>> return fmt.Sprintf("[checkIn:loopCnt:%d, errCnt:%d] error >>> %s", loopCnt, errCnt, fmt.Sprintf(format, params...)) >>> } >>> >>> that will flag if params does not include correct corresponding printf >>> verbs that are >>> passed in 'format' ??? above? >>> >>> If not 'go vet" I used but yet to remember tool I have done this with in >>> the past, >>> is there another way to do such checks? >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/69ad3ad0-94e7-48c7-bfb8-97a9b20af3fcn%40googlegroups.com.
