Hi Peter,

Please note that versions devel *go1.20-bcd44b61d3*, *1.19.1*, and *1.18.6* 
show times in the *4xxx ns/op* range for *BenchmarkSliceOfArray* while all 
the versions of *1.19* and *1.18* show times in the *2xxx ns/op* range. 

As noted earlier in this thread, the regression is seen on *ARM64* and not 
*AMD64*.

This time I have only included only results for *BenchmarkSliceOfArray*. 
The benchmarks for *BenchmarkSliceOfInt* do not exhibit regression. 

go version *devel go1.20-bcd44b61d3* Tue Sep 20 16:21:31 2022 +0000 
darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     262800              *4552* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.19.1* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     229941              *4607* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.19* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     449023              *2580* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.6* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     239430              *4377* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.5* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     506563              *2349* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.4* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     508051              *2362* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.3* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     431294              *2357* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.2* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     425918              *2715* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18.1* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     434580              *2351* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op
go version *go1.18* darwin/arm64
BenchmarkSliceOfArray     415366              *2482* ns/op           16384 
B/op          1 allocs/op


On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 12:53:40 PM UTC-4 peterGo wrote:

> Jan,
>
> An obvious typo. Read my original message: "I am unable to reproduce your 
> results on AMD64" 
>
> peter
>
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 12:14:32 PM UTC-4 Jan Mercl wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 6:02 PM peterGo <go.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I read that too. A fundamental tenet of science is 
>> reproducibility. I was able to reproduce the AMD64 results and documented 
>> it. A step forward.
>>
>> 5:24 PM (45 minutes ago) > I am unable to reproduce your results on AMD64.
>> 6:02 PM (7 minutes ago) > I was able to reproduce the AMD64 results
>> and documented it.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7a9b8be8-7f8a-48ac-81ab-24c0780009d9n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to