Thanks 在2023年4月5日星期三 UTC+8 03:38:21<Ian Lance Taylor> 写道：
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 12:05 PM fliter <imc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There are many private methods with identical code in several different > packages, which is clearly not elegant; But adding a public method that can > be accessed by other packages (a proposal needs to be made) does not seem > very necessary. Is there a better solution? > > Since you mention a proposal, I assume that you are talking about the > standard library. It's possible to coalesce identical functions into > an internal package. An internal package is not publicly visible and > as such does not require a proposal. > > Ian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/4d17d2fa-694f-491b-89ed-28cb9bdd2645n%40googlegroups.com.
