In article <a9iae8$pcc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> In article <a9i5mg$mb5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Mtv Europe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I'm sorry for flooding.
>>>
>>>>> -p @$=a..z;pop@$ while@$>3&&!/@$[-4..-1]/x;$_ x=@$>3
>>>> that's better -
>>>> -p @$=a..z;pop@$ until@$<4||/@$[-4..-1]/x;$_ x=@$>3
>>>
>>> -p @$=a..z;1until/@$[-4..-1]/x|!--$#$;$_ x=@$>3
>> Near the end it's going to match anyways, so you can do:
>> -p @z=a..z;$#z--until/@z[-4..-1]/x;$_ x=@z>3
> Rereading the originall august 2000 thread leads to:
> -p $_ x=/[a-w](??{($a=$&)++;$a++.$a++.$a})/
> (I'm not sorry for flooding)
Oh, that's obviously not optimal (we'll assume no 1 in the input)
-p $_ x=/.(??{join"",($&..z,1)[1..3]})/