Re: TPR(0,4b) is open

[Ton Hospel]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Rick Klement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>     .... ....
>     .... ...
>     ... ....
>     .. ...
>     . ..
> 
> there is a node name '....' that is both in a relationship and is included
> as an "isolated" node. I believe that is legal.
> 
duh ? But then it's not isolated ! Seems pretty weird to rule this valid.
Anyways, whatever you do, this deserves a rules update.