--- "F.Xavier Noria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess different
> labels
> mean different elements, so
>
> a b
> b a
>
> implies a != b, is not a partial order over the set {a, b}, and as
> I
> understand it valid output says so.
I concede. I believe others have said it all along, but the above
wording seals the matter in my mind - I was misinterpretting things.
I can't say I like general partial orders, I prefer strict partial
orders, which are irreflexive, and don't have these problems.
Sorry for gibbering.
Whilst it means my entry is valid, it doen't help me make it less
pathetic. :-(
I'm _frightened_ by the ease at which so many people have managed to
get in the very low 100s. You guys are just unbelievable. And the
sub-80s - not of this earth...
Phil
=====
--
"One cannot delete the Web browser from KDE without
losing the ability to manage files on the user's own
hard disk." - Prof. Stuart E Madnick, MIT.
So called "expert" witness for Microsoft. 2002/05/02
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
