On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Yanick wrote:
> > >
> > > Sir, consider fiery furry (or feathered, I have to check what's left
> > > in term of bio-ammos) retribution to be already on its way.
> >
> > Andry ostriches as missiles. *shudder*
>
> That was meant to be 'Angry ostriches', not an abbreviation for
> 'Androgenous ostriches'. You never know with Yanick.
For the last time, it's not mascara, it's war paint!
(well, okay, it /is/ mascara. It's almost impossible to find genuine war paint
that agrees with ovian's skin in any drug store, nowadays...)
`/anick
--
"You must wonder why I summoned you."
[..]"Not really. Or maybe, but only in an abstract and uninterested fashion. The same
way that, say, I could wonder if a garter belt on an ostrich would look sexy."
"Doesn't," [Theolark] said, "Legs are too skinny. The garters just keep flapping
around in the most ridiculous manner. But the esthetic impact of fine lingerie on very
big chickens is not what I wanted to discuss with you."
- Zwischenzug (http://babyl.dyndns.org/fadingsuns/prodigal)
