On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:25:20PM +0200, Juho Snellman wrote: > Phil Carmody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 1//regexp/ would crash on the same thing that s/regexp// fails to blank. > > So I thought that might be the intended (not space-saving) technique with > > a rather bizarre unnecessary use of an unquoted literal to add confusion! > > But a typo seems to make more sense. > > Typoing two characters and still ending up with a program that > implements the - admittedly loose - spec seems pretty unlikely :-) I > just liked the looks of the a/// operator.
That was too clever for me I guess. :) Ronald
