should'a RTFM'ed :)
On Aug 27, 1:20 am, datanucleus <andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > btw why does em.flush() throw an exception declaring that it requires
> > a transaction and that there is none in context when the Persistence
> > Provider is clearly configured for non-tx writes
>
> You mean according to the JPA spec 3.1.1, for flush()
> <spec>
> @throws TransactionRequiredException if there is no transaction
> </spec>
>
> so it complies with the JPA TCK then. Don't call flush in a non-tx
> context.
>
> --Andy (DataNucleus)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
