Hi Midhat. In the thread that leszek links to, I discuss this bug in a little more detail -- it seems you can't persist objects having an owned one-to-many relationship with objects of the same kind. Owned one-to-one relationships seem to work, however. As a workaround, you can use an unowned relationship (i.e. Set<Key> children) or specify a new class for the child objects. - Jason
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:57 AM, leszek <leszek.ptokar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Read this thread - could be helpfull : > > > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/google-appengine-java/browse_frm/thread/3affdf1441f864b6/99a166946ad0ef61?lnk=gst&q=self#99a166946ad0ef61 > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
