Hie yeah I did that.. and what I get are two different values from this block
At first time of app startup vik.sakshum.sakshumweb.jsp.model.jdo.PMF <clinit>: Loading PMF in com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.userclassloa...@1f7cdc7 and in another flow vik.sakshum.sakshumweb.jsp.model.jdo.PMF <clinit>: Loading PMF in com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.userclassloa...@1e6f0ef So, it means it is trying to load it in two different class loaders. So, how should I fix it? Thankx and Regards Vik Founder www.sakshum.com www.sakshum.blogspot.com On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Jason (Google) <apija...@google.com> wrote: > Based on one of your recent posts, it seems like multiple > PersistenceManagerFactory instances are being created by different > classloaders. Since this is an expensive operation, this could explain why > you're experiencing such slow performance. Did you follow Toby's suggestion > in the last post? > ----- > 1) Are you maybe loading that singleton class in different classloaders? > Try logging the classloader object reference that tries to create the > PersistenceManagerFactory. You can add a static initializer ABOVE > pmfInstance. > > static { > logger.log(Level.SEVERE, "Loading PMF in " + > PMF.class.getClassLoader()"); > } > ----- > > - Jason > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Vik <vik....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hie >> Strange to hear that if it is creating PMF again.... >> >> Should it do it just once when i logged in? In the logging process I do >> get an instance of PMF. So, why it is doing that again? >> Any advise what may be going wrong here? >> >> >> Thankx and Regards >> >> Vik >> Founder >> www.sakshum.com >> www.sakshum.blogspot.com >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:25 PM, datanucleus <andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> > 17. I09-03 09:46AM 31.994 >>> > >>> > vik.sakshum.sakshumweb.jsp.model.jdo.PMF <clinit>: Loading PMF in >>> > com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.userclassloa...@8fcc7b >>> > >>> > 18. I09-03 09:46AM 41.622 >>> >>> Don't you think it's a strange way to "benchmark" things by including >>> known one-off operations like creating a PMF ? >>> Personally that ought to be included in application startup timings, >>> rather than "time taken to read 200 records". >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---