Thank You!
On Oct 19, 10:42 pm, "Jason (Google)" <apija...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Max. It's certainly not a "bad" idea per se, but it will probably take
> some amount of work to move all of this data. If you haven't already, please
> see the documentation on the bulk loader tool -- it's currently only
> available in Python, but you can still use it with your Java apps. It's a
> much better solution than setting a script to import all of your data in
> 30-second increments.
>
> http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html
>
> As leszek's link points out, applications with billing enabled can handle up
> to 500 requests per second by default, and this can be configured higher if
> your traffic warrants an increase.
>
> - Jason
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Max <max.seven....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought AppEngine is designed to scale.
> > But recently I heard that AppEngine does not scale.
>
> > Someone benchmarked AppEngine with ab but AppEngine stopped to handle
> > requests after certain level of load. It seems that only one server
> > instance handle requests for 1 user.
>
> > If I will switch to paid account will it scale in case when load
> > jumps?
>
> > I though AppEngine is good choice for sites that may get high traffic.
>
> > ----
>
> > 2. We had plans to move one of our databases (6~10 GB) to AppEngine
> > and access it throw REST. Is it a good idea?
>
> > Thanks, Max
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
