context.getSesion()? Shouldn't that be context.getSession().

On Nov 14, 1:50 pm, Gerd Saurer <gerd.sau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anybody see a failure in the persistence code?
>
> On Oct 27, 3:29 pm, Gerd Saurer <gerd.sau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > public SyncConfigResult create(){
>
> >  SyncConfigResult retVal = null;
> >  PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
>
> >  try {
> >   SyncConfiguration syncConfig = new SyncConfiguration();
> >   syncConfig.setAccount1(new Account(action.getEmail1()));
> >   syncConfig.setAccount2(new Account(action.getEmail2()));
> >   syncConfig = pm.makePersistent(syncConfig);
>
> >   context.getSesion().setAttribute(SyncConfigResult.SESSION_ID,
> > syncConfig.getId());
>
> >   retVal = SyncConfigActionHandler.buildSyncConfigResult
> > (syncConfig);
> >  } finally {
> >   pm.close();
> >  }
> >  return retVal;
>
> > }
>
> > On Oct 26, 11:08 pm, "Jason (Google)" <apija...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > > Can you post the code you're using to persist the SyncConfiguration and
> > > Account objects?
>
> > > - Jason
>
> > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM,GerdSaurer<gerd.sau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I have a object mapped to the Datastore that looks like:
>
> > > > @PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
> > > > public class SyncConfiguration {
>
> > > >       �...@primarykey
> > > >       �...@persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
> > > >        private Long id;
>
> > > >       �...@persistent
> > > >        private Account account1;
>
> > > >       �...@persistent
> > > >        private Account account2;
>
> > > > ......
> > > > }
>
> > > > @PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
> > > > public class Account {
>
> > > >       �...@primarykey
> > > >       �...@persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
> > > >        private Key key;
>
> > > >       �...@persistent
> > > >        private String email;
>
> > > > .....
> > > > }
>
> > > > if i am now loading the object back from the store with
>
> > > > final SyncConfiguration syncConfig = pm.getObjectById
> > > > (SyncConfiguration.class, action.getSyncConfigId());
>
> > > > the fields account1 and account2 have the same instance.
>
> > > > Do i have to configure something in a different way or is it a bug?

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=.


Reply via email to