Thanks a lot!
On 22 Dec 2009, at 14:16, datanucleus wrote: >> Is that mean that using a String type is not a bad thing to do? > > From a pure persistence point of view, using a portable type (Long, > String etc) makes total sense, since your classes aren't tied to GAE. > Obviously Google may have some hidden functionality in their Key but > thats for them to comment on > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
