That's something I didn't knew. It's something usefull to know
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:19 PM, John Patterson <jdpatter...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yeah the annotations are fine. The GWT compiler does not include them in
> the compiled JS code.
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:09, Christian Goudreau wrote:
>
> Yes, a lot actually. I was asking myself that question since I introduced
> in my POJO's some TWIG annotation and didn't know if those information are
> compatible with GWT-RPC Mecanism.
>
> I'll give a deeper look into twig tomorow.
>
> Thanks
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, John Patterson <jdpatter...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Damob,
>>
>> They work perfectly together because your data models are *pure* POJOs
>> with no dependencies on the datastore at all.
>>
>> In contrast, in JDO, JPA, Objectify and SimpleDS your data models usually
>> use low-level Keys and possibly other types. This means that you either
>> need to make an extra layer of DTO's or make your UI code dependant on the
>> low-level API.
>>
>> For example, a Band and its Musicians can be sent to GWT as a single
>> object:
>>
>> class Band
>> {
>> @Key String name;
>> List<Musician> members;
>> }
>>
>> With all the other libraries the data model needs Keys which complicates
>> things. You might send the Band and then need to send more requests to read
>> each band member from its Key.
>>
>> I send data directly from my data layer to my GWT client and my client
>> code does not reference any com.google.appengine.* classes at all.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 03:29, Damob wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering how well those two works together and how to link
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
