BTW, the duration of the query fluctuates a lot. 2 sec to 15 secs. On Apr 26, 10:05 am, mandar khadilk <mkhad...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have been testing gql based datastore performance for a while now. > I am very disappointed so for what performance we are getting from our > simple un-ordered fetch/get. > > Here is what we are doing- > 1. Make a "kind" based query with no filter and ordering. We fetch all > the entity (not just keys) as we need attributes of the entities too. > > 2. We use cursors with prefetch of 100 and chunk size 50. > > 3. Each entity is around 100k > > We get around 7 sec to 15 secs to prepare the query and iterate over > it (100 entities). In the fetch loop, we dont execute much code to > consume CPU at all. We also use asQueryResultIterator. > > My question is, is this a normal performance? Are others getting way > better than this? > If yes, that is terrible. Is there a way to improve it further? > > Thanks in advance... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
