Here is workaround to the problem.

http://practicingengineer.blogspot.com/2010/05/another-approach-to-full-text-search-on.html

Summary:
1. Utilize the search capability on Amazon simpleDB.
2. I use heroku free account to look up on amazon simple db


On Apr 6, 2:55 am, John Patterson <jdpatter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes fulltextsearchis on the road map.  It can't be far away because  
> some of the implementation has already slipped into the current  
> release.  See the protected method Query.setFullTextSearch()
>
> On 6 Apr 2010, at 16:04, Toby wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I am wondering iftextsearchis actually on the official road map and
> > if so when it will be available. If not, would it make sense to start
> > a google code project to do our own implementation?  I am thinking of
> > something simple and light without the need of lots of jar. I think it
> > is quite some work and it would be worthless if GAE will have this
> > feature in the near future. Also I guess it can be implemented more
> > efficiently on google side reusing all the infrastructure that they
> > have already in place.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Toby
>
> > On Mar 29, 6:32 am, Tristan <tristan.slomin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> another way is to implement a full-textsearchyourself...
> >> implementing this would work:
>
> >>http://www.miislita.com/term-vector/term-vector-3.html(use tri-grams
> >> instead of full words as tokens)
>
> >> i would recommend low-level datastore api for that, also, your index
> >> term entities will blow up beyond 1MB, i built mindash-datastore to
> >> handle that
>
> >> :) or you can wait for a few months for Google
>
> >> On Mar 25, 3:05 pm,niraj<njun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I am debating if I should use Compass or wait for Google to release
> >>> something.
>
> >>> I can wait for 3-4 months as my website is going to take that amount
> >>> of time to complete.
>
> >>>Niraj
>
> >>> On Mar 16, 3:16 am, Toby <toby.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> I am using compass as well and it works fine. The indexing part is
> >>>> costly and you might need to do task queue if you reindex large  
> >>>> amount
> >>>> of data. Starting thesearchmanager is slow and it happens a lot due
> >>>> to the suspend policy.
>
> >>>> You can also take a look at this 
> >>>> project:http://code.google.com/p/gaelucene/
>
> >>>> I hope there will be a native solution by GAE one day (is there an
> >>>> issue to vote for?)
>
> >>>> On Mar 16, 10:21 am, yjun hu <itswa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> haha, up to now,i use compass okay!
>
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, objectuser  
> >>>>> <kevin.k.le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> I think there are a lot of posts here that conclude Compass is  
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>> viable.  Has that changed?
>
> >>>>>> On Mar 15, 12:23 am, yjun hu <itswa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> you can try compass to make you project searchable. a simple  
> >>>>>>> demo
> >>>>>> herehttp://hapeblog.appspot.com/blog.shtml?id=7002
>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 8:36 PM, John Patterson  
> >>>>>>> <jdpatter...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Interesting to see the existence protected
> >>>>>> Query.setFullTextSearch(String)
> >>>>>>>> method when you open the Query class in Eclipse.  I suppose  
> >>>>>>>> it won't be
> >>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>> far away.  I can't wait to see if they just give us a
> >>>>>> take-it-or-leave-it
> >>>>>>>> solution or also the tools required to roll your own.
>
> >>>>>>>> On 14 Mar 2010, at 15:05, Robert Lancer wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>  Haha, like many of us you probably thought that GOOGLE app  
> >>>>>>>> engine
> >>>>>>>>> would have decenttextsearchcapabilities.
>
> >>>>>>>>> It looks like your doing all you can do by creating the  
> >>>>>>>>> inverse table,
> >>>>>>>>> you may just want to star
> >>>>>>>>>http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=217
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 8:59 pm,niraj<njun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> My case:
> >>>>>>>>>> I am building a website that has several searchable fields  
> >>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>> various entities (example Artist names from artist entity ,  
> >>>>>>>>>> Album
> >>>>>>>>>> names from album entity). To have an  
> >>>>>>>>>> efficientsearchcapability I
> >>>>>>>>>> have defined another Entity - SearchType which carries the  
> >>>>>>>>>> Searchable
> >>>>>>>>>> string and the Foreign key to the Entity. Instead of  
> >>>>>>>>>> querying all the
> >>>>>>>>>> Entities one my one - I query SearchType.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> My preliminary tests indicate that the query  performance on
> >>>>>>>>>> SearchType is not great (the names are indexed) . I need  
> >>>>>>>>>> google
> >>>>>>>>>> suggest like quick results in a drop down. What is the best  
> >>>>>>>>>> way to
> >>>>>>>>>> design this.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I have considered Memcache , but I dont think I can run  
> >>>>>>>>>> queries on
> >>>>>>>>>> Memcache . i.e I am running a startsWith() query on JDO  
> >>>>>>>>>> today.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Any best practices .
>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
> >>>>>>>>> Google
> >>>>>> Groups
> >>>>>>>>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> >>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>>>>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
> >>>>>>>>> appengine-java%2B unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>>> <google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
> >>>>>> appengine-java %252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>
> >>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
> >>>>>>>> Google
> >>>>>> Groups
> >>>>>>>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>>>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
> >>>>>>>> appengine-java%2B unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>>> <google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
> >>>>>> appengine-java %252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>
> >>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> dream or truth
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
> >>>>>> Google Groups
> >>>>>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>>> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
> >>>>>> appengine-java%2B unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >>>>>> .
> >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> dream or truth
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
> > .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to