It's called "JRE Class White List" not "JRE Class and Interface White List" ;)
I know the whitelist very well and know about the absence of many interfaces. My question is why are interfaces like: java.awt.Shape and java.awt.Graphics2D missing? That certain classes and implementations of interfaces from the JRE are missing makes sense. But interfaces? Why? Cheers, Dieter P.S.: This is especially annoying since many libraries one might want to port extensively use those interfaces. Using those interfaces would make porting much easier and even allows changing the library in a way that allows using it both with the full JRE and Appengine. On Jun 13, 8:49 am, Didier Durand <durand.did...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Shape is not in the white list: all the classes part of it are > detailed herehttp://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/jrewhitelist.html > > regards > > didier > > On Jun 13, 4:27 am, Dieter Krachtus <dieter.krach...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I am relatively new to Java appengine but I can imagine why one needs > > something like a whitelist. Still I am wondering if (and if not, why) > > all Interfaces are in the whitelist? > > > Just one > > example:http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/awt/Shape.html > > > Cheers, > > Dieter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
