Nonsense. At least 2 of the developers are very active in this group in helping people resolve specific problems with their code. The fact that they're ignoring your demands to reveal their trade secrets doesn't mean they're not reading them.
On Sep 18, 1:32 am, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1... I actually would be happy with even a NOT firm date... but don't > hold your breath! It doesn't look like may GAE team people are really > paying attention to this group. > > On Sep 17, 6:44 am, FreeAgent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello to the GAE team! > > > I've been a fan of App Engine since launch. > > > Last night, I attended a talk on Amazon Web Services and I got into a > > discussion with potential clients about using AWS to serve their > > needs. > > > Afterwards, I thought of a design using App Engine. > > > The hitch is: it's a high-bandwidth application which could surpass > > the 10,000 MB limits (on upload and download) from App Engine. The CPU- > > cycle limits could be exceeded too, but they're harder to estimate. > > > On the other hand, it will take some time to implement the > > application, so we may be able to wait until more resources are > > available from App Engine. > > > Can you offer firm dates for the availability of more bandwidth & > > cycles--and billing for those resources? (I know you said it would be > > before year-end.) > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Kevin Noonan, > > Dublin, Ireland. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
