It's worth filing this as a feature request (or defect) in the public issue tracker, if you haven't already: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
As far as I know this method has existed since 1.1.6: Some developers ran into issues involving cheetah, which assumes that any has_key method behaves like that of a dict which, as you've noted, the one no db.Model doesn't. Daniel On Dec 1, 1:54 pm, Ken Tidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently, some bright spark has defined a has_key method on db.Model. > > Doing so will preclude the creation of any Model derived from or > emulating dictionary classes (such as UserDict or DictMixin). > > The has_key method in question does not follow the same semantics as > has_key on dict so the choice of name is unfortunate, to say the least. > > Any chance the method could be renamed to something less toxic and more > suggestive of its actual function (such as key_complete)? > > ken --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
