True it would be a big benefit for us in terms of risk profile, but I am not sure what Google's strategic advantage would be if they open source the entire app engine platform. Sure more people would use it, but Google wants more people to be using it _on their servers_, not somebody else's.
On Feb 4, 11:12 pm, 陈浩 <chenha...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my opinion, gae depended some function it's own system, whether > sharing code needing discussion. > You can coding under any framework without gae (such as djaogo) and > deploy them to gae server so you can run your app in any python > enviroment. > > On 2/5/09, mcamirand <maxcamir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > If we keep our app in its current form, we can choose from thousands > > of hosts. If we migrate to GAE, our app can only work on GAE. We are > > bound to Google's pricing, SLA, privacy policy, whims. Why doesn't > > Google revolutionize hosting by licensing out the GAE environment? If > > the neighbourhood datacentre could offer me a GAE environment, I'd be > > converting my app tomorrow. > > > Everyone is already amazed by what's been created here. Google > > shouldn't wait until someone releases an open-source implementation of > > GAE that becomes the new standard for the hosting world, replacing > > dedicated servers and virtual private servers. > > > -m > > -- > This letter from ChenHao. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
