Does Google not like the art of hacktivism?
On Mar 15, 8:23 pm, xml2jsonp <davide.rogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, then Why this response:
>
> "ok, we understand it's art, but you have to stop it
> now".http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2008/01/how-did-neural.php
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, Andy Freeman <ana...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > (1) Google won't pay for fraudulent clicks that it detects.
> > (2) Google's market cap is a lot larger than the relevant revenue
> > stream.
> > (3) Buying significant numbers of shares drives the share price up,
> > making (2) a bigger issue.
> > (4) Once you accumulate a certain % of shares, you have to file
> > reports with the SEC.
> > (5) The shares that control Google aren't on the market.
>
> > On Mar 15, 10:56 am, xml2jsonp <davide.rogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Is legal implement this idea on GAE
> > > ?http://gwei.org/pages/diagram/diagram.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
