Hi Jeremiah. Depending on your needs, we may be able to accommodate your request for additional applications. Please use the quota increase request form, linked below, and provide a description of what you're trying to build, and we'll reply to your request shortly. http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineContact
Thanks, - Jason On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jeremiah Elliott < jelli...@integrityemr.com> wrote: > The TOS will only be violated if the purpose of using multiple accounts is > to get around paying. We full expect to pay for every application we have. > Why would google delete an account that is paying them money every month? > If, however, I had an application that cross-talked between applications and > did so in a manner that completely eliminated the need to pay, then I could > see google not liking that. This application will have no data being shared > between applications. Therefor, will not be in violation of the TOS. > > ---Jeremiah > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Wooble <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> And your customers will *love* you when Google deletes all of their >> data along with your apps for violating the terms of use... >> >> On Apr 13, 9:37 am, gabriel munteanu <jajali...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > i think you should do these 10 apps for yourself and every friend you >> > have with a google account [you + 3 friends = 40 apps]. >> > i won't bet that they will increase this number any time soon. >> > >> > jgabios >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Jeremiah Elliott >> > >> > >> > >> > <jelli...@integrityemr.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hello All - >> > > I am doing some research for a project that I have coming up and have >> > > a few questions that I have not been able to find by searching the >> > > group. This will be my first AppEngine application, so sorry if this >> > > is a dumb question. The project is going to be a SASS model >> > > application where our customers will have a web application that we >> > > write made available to them. While I realize that I could have a >> > > customer id in every object stored in the data store and write >> > > business logic to verify that each customer sees only their data, I >> > > would rather have each customer have their own complete appengine >> > > application with their own tables that are totally separate. If I put >> > > all customers in one application, i will not be able to upgrade the >> > > application per-customer, but rather all at once. Currently I only >> > > have available 10 applications when I sign in. The other advantage of >> > > having all customers in their own application instance is that we will >> > > know exactly what the resources for a given customer is every month. >> > >> > > I am hoping that Google increases the number of available applications >> > > as i use them. So when I utilize my 9th applicaiton, it shows that I >> > > actually have 20 or something like that. I have not found any thing on >> > > the web that would give me any indication one way or the other if this >> > > is the case, so I am assuming that it isn't. >> > >> > > If having more than 10 applications is simply not an option, are there >> > > any good workarounds from a data store point of view? Anything like >> > > schemas in most relational databases? >> > >> > > Has anyone asked google to increase this limit? If so how did that >> > > work out? >> > >> > -- >> > jgabioshttp://bash.editia.info >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
